Comparison of conventional, model-based quantitative planar, and quantitative SPECT image processing methods for organ activity estimation using In-111 agents
- 2 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 51 (16), 3967-3981
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/16/006
Abstract
Accurate quantification of organ radionuclide uptake is important for patient-specific dosimetry. The quantitative accuracy from conventional conjugate view methods is limited by overlap of projections from different organs and background activity, and attenuation and scatter. In this work, we propose and validate a quantitative planar (QPlanar) processing method based on maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of organ activities using 3D organ VOIs and a projector that models the image degrading effects. Both a physical phantom experiment and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) studies were used to evaluate the new method. In these studies, the accuracies and precisions of organ activity estimates for the QPlanar method were compared with those from conventional planar (CPlanar) processing methods with various corrections for scatter, attenuation and organ overlap, and a quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) processing method. Experimental planar and SPECT projections and registered CT data from an RSD Torso phantom were obtained using a GE Millenium VH/Hawkeye system. The MCS data were obtained from the 3D NCAT phantom with organ activity distributions that modelled the uptake of (111)In ibritumomab tiuxetan. The simulations were performed using parameters appropriate for the same system used in the RSD torso phantom experiment. The organ activity estimates obtained from the CPlanar, QPlanar and QSPECT methods from both experiments were compared. From the results of the MCS experiment, even with ideal organ overlap correction and background subtraction, CPlanar methods provided limited quantitative accuracy. The QPlanar method with accurate modelling of the physical factors increased the quantitative accuracy at the cost of requiring estimates of the organ VOIs in 3D. The accuracy of QPlanar approached that of QSPECT, but required much less acquisition and computation time. Similar results were obtained from the physical phantom experiment. We conclude that the QPlanar method, based on 3D organ VOIs and accurate models of the projection process, provided a substantial increase in accuracy of organ activity estimates from planar images compared to CPlanar processing and had accuracy approaching that of QSPECT.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Monte Carlo and physical phantom evaluation of quantitative In-111 SPECTPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2005
- Partial volume effect compensation for quantitative brain SPECT imagingIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2005
- Combination of MCNP and SimSET for Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT with medium- and high-energy photonsIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2002
- Fast implementations of reconstruction-based scatter compensation in fully 3D SPECT image reconstructionPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1998
- Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection dataIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1994
- Least squares algorithm for region-of-interest evaluation in emission tomographyIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1993
- Preliminary validation of the opposing view method for quantitative gamma camera imagingMedical Physics, 1989
- A Maximum Likelihood Method for Region-of-Interest Evaluation in Emission TomographyJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1986
- External imaging techniques for quantitation of distribution of I-131 F (ab ′)2 fragments of monoclonal antibody in humansMedical Physics, 1984
- Physical Factors Affecting Quantitative Measurements Using Camera-Based Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (Spect)IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1981