Moderators of an intervention on emotional and behavioural problems: household- and school-level parental education
Open Access
- 18 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 32 (6), 864-870
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac143
Abstract
Children of lower-educated parents and children in schools with a relatively high percentage of peers with lower-educated parents (lower parental education schools) are more likely to develop emotional and behavioural problems compared to children in higher-educated households and schools. Universal school-based preventive interventions, such as the Good Behaviour Game (GBG), are generally effective in preventing the development of emotional and behavioural problems, but information about potential moderators is limited. This study examined whether the effectiveness of the GBG in preventing emotional and behavioural problems differs between children in lower- and higher-educated households and schools. Using a longitudinal multi-level randomized controlled trial design, 731 children (Mage=6.02 towards the end of kindergarten) from 31 mainstream schools (intervention arm: 21 schools, 484 children; control arm: 10 schools, 247 children) were followed annually from kindergarten to second grade (2004–2006). The GBG was implemented in first and second grades. Overall, the GBG prevented the development of emotional and behavioural problems. However, for emotional problems, the GBG-effect was slightly more pronounced in higher parental education schools than in lower parental education schools (Bhigher parental education schools =−0.281, P Blower parental education schools =−0.140, P = 0.016). No moderation by household-level parental education was found. Studies into universal school-based preventive interventions, and in particular the GBG, should consider and incorporate school-level factors when studying the effectiveness of such interventions. More attention should be directed towards factors that may influence universal prevention effectiveness, particularly in lower parental education schools.Funding Information
- Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (531003013, #26200002, #120620029)
- Norwegian Research Council (288638)
- Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research
- Norwegian University for Science and Technology
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: A systematic reviewSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2013
- For Whom Does It Work? Subgroup Differences in the Effects of a School-Based Universal Prevention ProgramPrevention Science, 2013
- The Good Behavior Game: A classroom-behavior intervention effective across culturesSchool Psychology International, 2013
- Poverty and Mental Health: How Do Low‐Income Adults and Children Fare in Psychotherapy?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2012
- Classwide Intervention to Manage Disruptive Behavior in the Kindergarten ClassroomJournal of Applied School Psychology, 2010
- The effects of a multiyear universal social–emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2010
- Universal Social Competence Promotion Programme in School: Does it Work for Children with Low Socio-Economic Background?Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 2009
- Do mental health problems in childhood predict chronic physical conditions among males in early adulthood? Evidence from a community-based prospective studyPsychological Medicine, 2008
- Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: evaluation of the Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs in high‐risk schoolsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2008
- School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior: Update of a Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007