Efficiency and safety of speech recognition for documentation in the electronic health record
Open Access
- 27 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 24 (6), 1127-1133
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx073
Abstract
To compare the efficiency and safety of using speech recognition (SR) assisted clinical documentation within an electronic health record (EHR) system with use of keyboard and mouse (KBM). Thirty-five emergency department clinicians undertook randomly allocated clinical documentation tasks using KBM or SR on a commercial EHR system. Tasks were simple or complex, and with or without interruption. Outcome measures included task completion times and observed errors. Errors were classed by their potential for patient harm. Error causes were classified as due to IT system/system integration, user interaction, comprehension, or as typographical. User-related errors could be by either omission or commission. Mean task completion times were 18.11% slower overall when using SR compared to KBM (P = .001), 16.95% slower for simple tasks (P = .050), and 18.40% slower for complex tasks (P = .009). Increased errors were observed with use of SR (KBM 32, SR 138) for both simple (KBM 9, SR 75; P < 0.001) and complex (KBM 23, SR 63; P < 0.001) tasks. Interruptions did not significantly affect task completion times or error rates for either modality. For clinical documentation, SR was slower and increased the risk of documentation errors, including errors with the potential to cause clinical harm compared to KBM. Some of the observed increase in errors may be due to suboptimal SR to EHR integration and workflow. Use of SR to drive interactive clinical documentation in the EHR requires careful evaluation. Current generation implementations may require significant development before they are safe and effective. Improving system integration and workflow, as well as SR accuracy and user-focused error correction strategies, may improve SR performance.Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1032664)
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health recordJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2016
- Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic reviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2015
- Typed versus Voice Recognition for Data Entry in an Electronic Health Record: Emergency Department Physician Time Utilization and InterruptionsWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2014
- Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).2013
- The science of interruptionBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effectsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- The impact of interruptions on clinical task completionQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2010
- Accelerating the Use of Electronic Health Records in Physician PracticesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 2007
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968