Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- case report
- Vol. 111, 70-92
Abstract
To evaluate three measures related to electronic health record (EHR) implementation: clinical volume, time requirements, and nature of clinical documentation. Comparison is made to baseline paper documentation. An academic ophthalmology department implemented an EHR in 2006. A study population was defined of faculty providers who worked the 5 months before and after implementation. Clinical volumes, as well as time length for each patient encounter, were collected from the EHR reporting system. To directly compare time requirements, two faculty providers who utilized both paper and EHR systems completed time-motion logs to record the number of patients, clinic time, and nonclinic time to complete documentation. Faculty providers and databases were queried to identify patient records containing both paper and EHR notes, from which three cases were identified to illustrate representative documentation differences. Twenty-three faculty providers completed 120,490 clinical encounters during a 3-year study period. Compared to baseline clinical volume from 3 months pre-implementation, the post-implementation volume was 88% in quarter 1, 93% in year 1, 97% in year 2, and 97% in year 3. Among all encounters, 75% were completed within 1.7 days after beginning documentation. The mean total time per patient was 6.8 minutes longer with EHR than paper (P<.01). EHR documentation involved greater reliance on textual interpretation of clinical findings, whereas paper notes used more graphical representations, and EHR notes were longer and included automatically generated text. This EHR implementation was associated with increased documentation time, little or no increase in clinical volume, and changes in the nature of ophthalmic documentation.This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of electronic health record implementation on patient flow metrics in a pediatric emergency departmentJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2012
- Evaluation of Vascular Disease Progression in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Static and Dynamic Retinal ImagesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
- Electronic Health Records and Quality of Diabetes CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findingsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health RecordsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician groupInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2010
- Physicians’ Attitudes Towards Copy and Pasting in Electronic Note WritingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Agreement among pediatric ophthalmologists in diagnosing plus and pre-plus disease in retinopathy of prematurityJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2008
- Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of PhysiciansThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008