Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Psychology & Health
- Vol. 27 (sup2), 59-73
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.565341
Abstract
Objective: Two studies examined the hypothesis that making snacks less accessible contributes to the regulation of food intake. Study 1 examined whether decreasing the accessibility of snacks reduces probability and amount of snack intake. The aim of Study 2 was to replicate the results and explore the underlying mechanism in terms of perceived effort to obtain the snack and perceived salience of the snack. Methods: In Study 1 (N = 77) and Study 2 (N = 54) distance to a bowl of snacks was randomly varied at 20, 70 or 140 cm in an experimental between-subjects design. Main outcome measures were the number of people who ate any snacks (probability of snack intake), the amount of snacks consumed and risk of compensatory behaviour as measured by food craving. In Study 2, self-report ratings of salience and effort were examined to explore potential underlying mechanisms. Results: Study 1 showed lower probability and amount of intake in either of more distant conditions (70 and 140 cm) compared to the proximal condition (20 cm), with no unintended effects in terms of increased craving. Study 2 replicated the results of Study 1 and showed that distance affected perceived effort but not salience. Conclusions: Making snacks less accessible by putting them further away is a potentially effective strategy to decrease snack intake, without risk of compensatory behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Taxes and Subsidies on Energy Purchased in an Experimental Purchasing StudyPsychological Science, 2010
- Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: Testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countriesAppetite, 2008
- Toward the reduction of population obesity: Macrolevel environmental approaches to the problems of food, eating, and obesity.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Food reinforcementAppetite, 2006
- Self‐Regulation in Health Behavior: Concepts, Theories, and Central IssuesPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Individual differences in reward sensitivity are related to food craving and relative body weight in healthy womenAppetite, 2005
- Effects of promotional materials on vending sales of low-fat items in teachers’ loungesJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2004
- Low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards access, availability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetablesPublic Health Nutrition, 2003
- Effect of a fruit and vegetable subscription in Danish schoolsPublic Health Nutrition, 2003
- Can fruits and vegetables and activities substitute for snack foods?Health Psychology, 2002