Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy
Top Cited Papers
- 24 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language Testing
- Vol. 26 (3), 445-466
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
Abstract
The assessment of oral language is now quite commonly done in pairs or groups, and there is a growing body of research which investigates the related issues (e.g. May, 2007). Writing generally tends to be thought of as an individual activity, although a small number of studies have documented the advantages of collaboration in writing in the second language classroom (e.g. DiCamilla & Anton, 1997; Storch, 2005; Swain & Lapkin, 1998). Particularly in university contexts, group or pair assignments are widely used in many disciplines. In addition, collaborative writing could be used in second language classroom assessment contexts as formative assessment. However, research which compares texts produced by learners collaboratively to texts produced individually, and the implications of this for assessment practices, is rare. This study is a first step in the investigation of using collaborative writing in second language contexts and comparing the performance of two groups of second language learners: one group worked individually, and the other group worked in pairs. When writing in pairs, each pair produced a single text. All participants completed one writing task: an argumentative essay. The performances of the individuals (N = 48) and the pairs (N = 48) were compared on detailed discourse analytic measures of fluency, complexity and accuracy. This comparison revealed that collaboration impacted positively on accuracy, but did not affect fluency and complexity. A detailed analysis of the pair transcripts recorded during the writing activity provides insights into the ways in which pairs work together, and the foci of their endeavour. The implications of these findings for in-class assessment of second language writing are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic AssessmentPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2008
- Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFLAssessing Writing, 2005
- 6. The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performancePublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,2005
- 13. ASPECTS OF COLLABORATION IN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSEAnnual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2004
- The Effects of Adding Dynamic Assessment Components to a Computerized Preschool Language Screening TestCommunication Disorders Quarterly, 2001
- "A Narrow Thinking System": Nonnative-English-Speaking Students in Group Projects across the CurriculumTESOL Quarterly, 2001
- Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasonsApplied Linguistics, 2000
- The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language PerformanceStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1996
- Examining Readiness for Learning Two-Word Utterances by Children With Specific Expressive Language ImpairmentAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1995
- Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language LearnersStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1989