Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal Of Medicine
- Vol. 127 (1), 95.e11-95.e17
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 UpdateCirculation, 2013
- Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2012
- Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Estimation of Total Incremental Health Care Costs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the United StatesCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2011
- Ambulatory Arrhythmia MonitoringCirculation, 2010
- Prospective comparison of the diagnostic utility of a standard event monitor versus a “leadless” portable ECG monitor in the evaluation of patients with palpitationsJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2008
- Utility of Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry for the Diagnosis of Palpitations, Presyncope, Syncope, and the Assessment of Therapy EfficacyJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2007
- Comparison of Autotriggered Memory Loop Recorders Versus Standard Loop Recorders Versus 24-Hour Holter Monitors for Arrhythmia DetectionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- First experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) system for the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Usefulness of Ambulatory 7-Day ECG Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackStroke, 2004