Comparison of Autotriggered Memory Loop Recorders Versus Standard Loop Recorders Versus 24-Hour Holter Monitors for Arrhythmia Detection
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 95 (9), 1055-1059
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Insertable Loop Recorder Use for Detection of Intermittent ArrhythmiasPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2004
- External loop recorders: determinants of diagnostic yield in patients with syncopeAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- MADIT‐I and MADIT‐IIJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2003
- Ambulatory Electrocardiographic RecordingCirculation, 2003
- Pacemaker Diagnostics:Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- Asymptomatic Atrial FibrillationSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2001
- Clinical value of vectorcardiography, Holter monitoring and quantitative electrocardiologyActa Cardiologica, 2000
- Evaluation of Patients with PalpitationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Asymptomatic arrhythmias in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.Circulation, 1994
- Optimum duration of transtelephonic ECG monitoring when used for transient symptomatic event detectionJournal of Electrocardiology, 1991