Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study
Open Access
- 20 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 13 (1), 279-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-279
Abstract
The strong association between family history and prostate cancer (PCa) suggests a significant genetic contribution, yet specific highly penetrant PCa susceptibility genes have not been identified. Certain single-nucleotide-polymorphisms have been found to correlate with PCa risk; however uncertainty remains regarding their clinical utility and how to best incorporate this information into clinical decision-making. Genetic testing is available directly to consumers and both patients and healthcare providers are becoming more aware of this technology. Purchasing online allows patients to bypass their healthcare provider yet patients may have difficulty interpreting test results and providers may be called upon to interpret results. Determining optimal ways to educate both patients and providers, and strategies for appropriately incorporating this information into clinical decision-making are needed. A mixed-method study was conducted in Utah between October 2011 and December 2011. Eleven focus group discussions were held and surveys were administered to 23 first-degree relatives of PCa patients living in Utah and 24 primary-care physicians and urologists practicing in Utah to present specific information about these assessments and determine knowledge and attitudes regarding health implications of using these assessments. Data was independently coded by two researchers (relative Kappa = .88; provider Kappa = .77) and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results indicated differences in attitudes and behavioral intentions between patient and provider. Despite the test’s limitations relatives indicated interest in genetic testing (52%) while most providers indicated they would not recommend the test for their patients (79%). Relatives expected providers to interpret genetic test results and use results to provide personalized healthcare recommendations while the majority of providers did not think the information would be useful in patient care (92%) and indicated low-levels of genetic self-efficacy. Although similarities exist, discordance between provider and patient attitudes may influence the effective translation of novel genomic tests into clinical practice suggesting both patient and provider perceptions and expectations be considered in development of clinical decision-support tools.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectivesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2012
- Essential Elements of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment, Counseling, and Testing: Updated Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic CounselorsJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2011
- Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcomePsycho‐Oncology, 2011
- Genomic Risk Profiling: Attitudes and Use in Personal and Clinical Care of Primary Care Physicians Who Offer Risk ProfilingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Age-Specific Risk of Incident Prostate Cancer and Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer Defined by the Number of Affected Family MembersEuropean Urology, 2010
- Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome TestingAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2009
- Diet, lifestyle and risk of prostate cancerActa Oncologica, 2005
- The Newfound Credibility of Qualitative Research? Tales of Technical Essentialism and Co-OptionQualitative Health Research, 2003
- Calcium, dairy products, and risk of prostate cancer in a prospective cohort of United States men.2003
- The Cancer Genetics Network: Recruitment Results and Pilot StudiesPublic Health Genomics, 2003