The Newfound Credibility of Qualitative Research? Tales of Technical Essentialism and Co-Option
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 13 (7), 1019-1027
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253331
Abstract
Qualitative research is no longer the “poor relation” to quantitative research that it has been in the past. However, it is important to monitor the manner in which it is becoming incorporated into the mainstream. In this article, the author examines current dangers and challenges by critically reviewing current developments affecting our own research practice. It is argued that technical essentialism (including the co-option of grounded theory) characterizes many responses to qualitative research. The author concludes by suggesting that our own everyday research practice, involving teaching and supervision, provides an opportunity to advance debates about rigor by allowing us to formulate a considered response that respects both the complexities and the unique contribution that qualitative research can make.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Awfulness of SimplificationQualitative Health Research, 2001
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?BMJ, 2001
- Steps and StrategiesQualitative Health Research, 2001
- Theoretical CongestionQualitative Health Research, 2000
- Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism?Family Practice, 1998
- Negotiating Selves: Reflections on ‘Unstructured’ InterviewingSociological Research Online, 1998
- Ensuring rigour in qualitative researchEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1997
- "Perfectly Healthy, but Dead": The Myth of Inter-Rater ReliabilityQualitative Health Research, 1997
- Narrative Turn or Blind Alley?Qualitative Health Research, 1997
- A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers?Family Practice, 1997