Artifacts and limitations of enzyme immunoassay
- 24 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Immunological Methods
- Vol. 150 (1-2), 111-119
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(92)90070-a
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of complement binding on a solid-phase immunometric TSH assayScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1989
- Factitious Elevation of Thyrotropin in a New Ultrasensitive Assay: Implications for the Use of Monoclonal Antibodies in “Sandwich” ImmunoassayJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1988
- Theoretical limitations on immunoassay sensitivity: Current practice and potential advantages of fluorescent Eu3+ chelates as non-radioisotopic tracersJournal of Immunological Methods, 1986
- Endogenous Digitalis-Like FactorsCRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 1986
- False positive immunometric assays caused by anti-immunoglobulin antibodies: a case reportClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1985
- A solid-phase enzyme immunoassay for C-reactive protein: Clinical value and the effect of rheumatoid factorJournal of Immunological Methods, 1984
- Immunology of DNA. IV. Quantitative aspects of the Farr assayJournal of Immunological Methods, 1976
- Immunology of DNA. I. The influence of reaction conditions on the farr assay as used for the detection of anti-ds DNAJournal of Immunological Methods, 1976
- Immunology of DNA. II. The effect of size and structure of the antigen on the farr assayJournal of Immunological Methods, 1976
- Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantitative assay of immunoglobulin GImmunochemistry, 1971