A Review of the True Methodological Quality of Nutritional Support Trials Conducted in the Critically Ill: Time for Improvement
Open Access
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 100 (2), 527-533
- https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000141676.12552.d0
Abstract
In this review we sought to appraise the true methodological quality of nutritional support studies conducted in critically ill patients and to compare these findings to the methodological quality of sepsis trials. An extensive literature search revealed 111 randomized controlled trials conducted in critically ill patients evaluating the impact of nutritional support interventions on clinically meaningful outcomes. Compared with sepsis trials, nutritional support studies were significantly less likely to use blinding (32 of 40 versus 35 of 111, P < 0.001) or present an intention-to-treat analysis (37 of 40 versus 64 of 111, P < 0.001). There was a trend toward the less frequent use of randomization methods that are known to maintain allocation concealment (12 of 40 versus 19 of 111, P = 0.10). Although nutritional support studies demonstrated a significant increase in the use of blinding after the publication of the CONSORT statement in 1996 (9 of 47 versus 26 of 64 post-CONSORT, P = 0.023), there were no improvements in other key areas. Previous publications have described the overall methodological quality of sepsis trials as "poor." Nutritional support studies were significantly worse than sepsis trials in all aspects of methodological quality, and there were few improvements noted over time. To detect important differences in clinically meaningful outcomes in critical care, the methodological quality of future studies must be improved.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutrition support in the critical care setting: current practice in canadian ICUs‐‐opportunities for improvement?Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2003
- Glutamine supplementation in serious illness: A systematic review of the evidence*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic QualityJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2002
- Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical studyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Randomized, controlled clinical trials in sepsis: Has methodological quality improved over time?Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Should Immunonutrition Become Routine in Critically Ill Patients?Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill PatientJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteriaStatistics in Medicine, 1989