Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
Open Access
- 6 March 2017
- Vol. 7 (3), e014496
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. Setting We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obstetric care, blood transfusion, and infection prevention, obtained from the WHO's SARA surveys in Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritania, Benin, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo. Primary and secondary outcome measures Among the facilities that were expected to offer surgical services (N=3492), there were wide disparities between the countries in the number of facilities per 100 000 population that reported offering basic surgery (1.0–12.1), comprehensive surgery (0.1–0.8), comprehensive obstetric care (0.1–0.8) and blood transfusion (0.1–0.8). Only 0.1–0.3 facilities per 100 000 population had all three bellwether procedures available, namely laparotomy, open fracture management and caesarean section. In all the countries, the facilities that reported offering surgical services generally had a shortage of the necessary items for offering the services and this varied greatly between the countries, with the facilities having on average 27–53% of the items necessary for offering basic surgery, 56–83% for comprehensive surgery, 49–72% for comprehensive obstetric care and 54–80% for blood transfusion. Furthermore, few facilities had all the necessary items present. However, facilities that reported offering surgical services had on average most of the necessary items for the prevention of infection. Conclusions There are important gaps in the surgical services in the 8 African countries surveyed. Efforts are therefore urgently needed to address deficiencies in the availability and readiness to deliver surgical services in these nations, and this will require commitment from multiple stakeholders. SARA may be used to monitor availability and readiness at regular intervals, which will enable stakeholders to evaluate progress and identify gaps and areas for improvement.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic developmentThe Lancet, 2015
- Global access to surgical care: a modelling studyThe Lancet. Global Health, 2015
- Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health EstimateThe Lancet. Global Health, 2015
- Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomesThe Lancet, 2015
- Monitoring service delivery for universal health coverage: the Service Availability and Readiness AssessmentBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2013
- Pediatric emergency and essential surgical care in Zambian hospitals: A nationwide studyJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2013
- Assessment of capacity for surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia in 17 Ghanaian hospitals using a WHO assessment toolTropical Medicine & International Health, 2010
- Essential Surgery at the District Hospital: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis in Three African CountriesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Human Resource and Funding Constraints for Essential Surgery in District Hospitals in Africa: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional SurveyPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Increasing Access to Surgical Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Priorities for National and International Agencies Recommended by the Bellagio Essential Surgery GroupPLoS Medicine, 2009