How do you fake a personality test? An investigation of cognitive models of impression-managed responding
- 30 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 116 (1), 163-171
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personality scale response latencies as self-schema indicators: The inverted-U effect revisitedPersonality and Individual Differences, 2007
- A Meta‐Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality MeasuresInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2006
- Why Openness to Experience is not a Good Predictor of Job PerformanceInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2004
- Applicants faking good: evidence of item bias in the NEO PI-RPersonality and Individual Differences, 2004
- Positive Impression Management and Its Influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A Comparison of Analog and Differential Prevalence Group Designs.Psychological Assessment, 2003
- Validating a double-press method for computer administration of personality inventory items.Psychological Assessment, 2001
- The Effects of Subject-Defined Categories on Judgmental Accuracy in Confidence Assessment TasksOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- Incremental Validity of Response Latencies for Detecting Fakers on a Personality TestJournal of Research in Personality, 1995
- Relative efficacy of differential response latencies for detecting faking on a self-report measure of psychopathology.Psychological Assessment, 1992
- Assessing psychopathology using structured test-item response latencies.Psychological Assessment, 1991