Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance?
- 16 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 328 (5976), 312-313
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187774
Abstract
A major new approach to emissions mitigation may interrupt a promising trend toward decentralized forest management.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010
- The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonScience, 2009
- Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commonsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Decentralization for cost-effective conservationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded LandsScience, 2008
- Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Global Land-Use ImplicationsScience, 2008
- Changing Governance of the World's ForestsScience, 2008
- Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratoryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest ResourcesWorld Development, 2006
- Changing Policies and the Persistence of Patron-Client Relations in Nepal: Stakeholders' Responses to Changes in Forest PoliciesEnvironmental History, 2001