Decentralization for cost-effective conservation
- 17 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 106 (11), 4143-4147
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810049106
Abstract
Since 1930, areas of state-managed forest in the central Himalayas of India have increasingly been devolved to management by local communities. This article studies the long-run effects of the devolution on the cost of forest management and on forest conservation. Village council-management costs an order of magnitude less per unit area and does no worse, and possibly better, at conservation than state management. Geographic proximity and historical and ecological information are used to separate the effects of management from those of possible confounding factors.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in BoliviaJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2006
- The Struggle to Govern the CommonsScience, 2003
- Making Deforestation Pay Under the Kyoto Protocol?Science, 2003
- Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003
- Rain Forest Conservation Under ReviewScience, 2000
- Economic Incentives for Rain Forest Conservation Across ScalesScience, 2000
- Governing the CommonsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Analysis of Forest Land-use and Vegetation in a Part of Central Himalaya, Using Aerial PhotographsEnvironmental Conservation, 1987
- Mapping forest biomass in India through aerial photographs and nondestructive field samplingApplied Geography, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983