What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 12 (2), e0170581
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170581
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) is often reputed to be cost-effective or cost-saving. Despite optimism, the strength of the evidence supporting this assertion has been limited. In this systematic review the body of evidence related to economic evaluations of mHealth interventions is assessed and summarized. Seven electronic bibliographic databases, grey literature, and relevant references were searched. Eligibility criteria included original articles, comparison of costs and consequences of interventions (one categorized as a primary mHealth intervention or mHealth intervention as a component of other interventions), health and economic outcomes and published in English. Full economic evaluations were appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist and The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Searches identified 5902 results, of which 318 were examined at full text, and 39 were included in this review. The 39 studies spanned 19 countries, most of which were conducted in upper and upper-middle income countries (34, 87.2%). Primary mHealth interventions (35, 89.7%), behavior change communication type interventions (e.g., improve attendance rates, medication adherence) (27, 69.2%), and short messaging system (SMS) as the mHealth function (e.g., used to send reminders, information, provide support, conduct surveys or collect data) (22, 56.4%) were most frequent; the most frequent disease or condition focuses were outpatient clinic attendance, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. The average percent of CHEERS checklist items reported was 79.6% (range 47.62–100, STD 14.18) and the top quartile reported 91.3–100%. In 29 studies (74.3%), researchers reported that the mHealth intervention was cost-effective, economically beneficial, or cost saving at base case. Findings highlight a growing body of economic evidence for mHealth interventions. Although all studies included a comparison of intervention effectiveness of a health-related outcome and reported economic data, many did not report all recommended economic outcome items and were lacking in comprehensive analysis. The identified economic evaluations varied by disease or condition focus, economic outcome measurements, perspectives, and were distributed unevenly geographically, limiting formal meta-analysis. Further research is needed in low and low-middle income countries and to understand the impact of different mHealth types. Following established economic reporting guidelines will improve this body of research.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR014205)
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled weight loss trial among lactating overweight/obese womenBMC Public Health, 2014
- Text Messaging Data Collection for Monitoring an Infant Feeding Intervention Program in Rural China: Feasibility StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual frameworkGlobal Health: Science and Practice, 2013
- Mapping mHealth Research: A Decade of EvolutionJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- Text-messaging versus telephone reminders to reduce missed appointments in an academic primary care clinic: a randomized controlled trialBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mobile Phone Text-Message Reminder Programmes to Improve Health Workers' Adherence to Malaria Guidelines in KenyaPLOS ONE, 2012
- The cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation support delivered by mobile phone text messaging: Txt2stopThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2012
- Effectiveness of mobile-phone short message service (SMS) reminders for ophthalmology outpatient appointments: Observational studyBMC Ophthalmology, 2008
- Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: A randomized controlled trialJournal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2008