Text Messaging Data Collection for Monitoring an Infant Feeding Intervention Program in Rural China: Feasibility Study
Open Access
- 4 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 15 (12), e269
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2906
Abstract
Background: An effective data collection method is crucial for high quality monitoring of health interventions. The traditional face-to-face data collection method is labor intensive, expensive, and time consuming. With the rapid increase of mobile phone subscribers, text messaging has the potential to be used for evaluation of population health interventions in rural China. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of using text messaging as a data collection tool to monitor an infant feeding intervention program. Methods: Participants were caregivers of children aged 0 to 23 months in rural China who participated in an infant feeding health education program. We used the test-retest method. First, we collected data with a text messaging survey and then with a face-to-face survey for 2 periods of 3 days. We compared the response rate, data agreement, costs, and participants’ acceptability of the two methods. Also, we interviewed participants to explore their reasons for not responding to the text messages and the reasons for disagreement in the two methods. In addition, we evaluated the most appropriate time during the day for sending text messages. Results: We included 258 participants; 99 (38.4%) participated in the text messaging survey and 177 (68.6%) in the face-to-face survey. Compared with the face-to-face survey, the text messaging survey had much lower response rates to at least one question (38.4% vs 68.6%) and to all 7 questions (27.9% vs 67.4%) with moderate data agreement (most kappa values between .5 and .75, the intraclass correlation coefficients between .53 to .72). Participants who took part in both surveys gave the same acceptability rating for both methods (median 4.0 for both on a 5-point scale, 1=disliked very much and 5=liked very much). The costs per questionnaire for the text messaging method were much lower than the costs for the face-to-face method: ¥19.7 (US $3.13) versus ¥33.9 (US $5.39) for all questionnaires, and ¥27.1 (US $4.31) versus ¥34.4 (US $5.47) for completed questionnaires. The main reasons for not replying were that participants did not receive text messages, they were too busy to reply, or they did not see text messages in time. The main reasons for disagreement in responses were that participants forgot their answers in the text messaging survey and that they changed their minds. We found that participants were more likely to reply to text messages immediately during 2 time periods: 8 AM to 3 PM and 8 PM to 9 PM. Conclusions: The text messaging method had reasonable data agreement and low cost, but a low response rate. Further research is needed to evaluate effectiveness of measures that can increase the response rate, especially in collecting longitudinal data by text messaging. [J Med Internet Res 2013;15(12):e269]This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analyzing repeated data collected by mobile phones and frequent text messages. An example of Low back pain measured weekly for 18 weeksBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Feasibility of Using Short Message Service to Collect Pain Outcomes in a Low Back Pain Clinical TrialSpine, 2012
- Project TwEATs. A feasibility study testing the use of automated text messaging to monitor appetite ratings in a free-living populationAppetite, 2011
- Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Challenges in Using Mobile Phones for Collection of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Data in a Resource-Limited SettingAIDS and Behavior, 2010
- The longitudinal course of bipolar disorder as revealed through weekly text messaging: a feasibility studyBipolar Disorders, 2010
- Mobile Phone Technology: A New Paradigm for the Prevention, Treatment, and Research of the Non-sheltered “Street” Homeless?Journal of Urban Health, 2010
- Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force ReportValue in Health, 2009
- SMS versus telephone interviews for epidemiological data collection: feasibility study estimating influenza vaccination coverage in the Swedish populationEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Maximising response rates in household telephone surveysBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008