Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Applied Psychology
- Vol. 88 (1), 50-66
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50
Abstract
The construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance was assessed by using 2 data sets, each based on a different 360 degrees rating instrument. Specifically, the authors investigated the nature of the constructs measured by developmental ratings, the structural relationships among those constructs, and the generalizability of results across 4 rater perspectives (boss, peer, subordinate, and self). A structure with 4 lower order factors (Technical Skills, Administrative Skills, Human Skills, and Citizenship Behaviors) and 2 higher order factors (Task Performance and Contextual Performance) was tested against competing models. Results consistently supported the lower order constructs, but the higher order structure was problematic, indicating that the structure of ratings is not yet well understood. Multisample analyses indicated few practically significant differences in factor structures across perspectives.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up TimeHuman Performance, 1997
- A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 1997
- Models of Job Performance Ratings: An Examination of Ratee Race, Ratee Gender, and Rater Level EffectsHuman Performance, 1996
- Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Differential Dimensions Employed in Rating Subordinates, Peers, and SuperiorsThe Journal of Psychology, 1988
- Personal constructs, performance schemata, and “folk theories” of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sampleOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- The systematic distortion hypothesis, halo, and accuracy: An individual-level analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960