Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how?
- 24 April 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
- Vol. 27 (1), 67-79
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.777270
Abstract
Systematic reviews of qualitative research have increasing currency for evidence-based policy-making. Potentially, this can prevent further marginalization of qualitative evidence, increase our understanding of the body of work undertaken by qualitative researchers and allow broader, more overarching theories about studied phenomenon to be built. Qualitative researchers have so far failed to agree what constitutes “validity” or “quality” in their work: these debates have mirrored the epistemological differences within which such research is undertaken. This paper explores the arguments about quality appraisal and, drawing on this literature, builds a proposal to which, it is hoped, qualitative researchers from across disciplines may be able to ascribe. Technical reporting standards could be agreed that make the conduct of the research clearer. Additional elements, related to study trustworthiness and theoretical and practical considerations, could be appraised discursively, allowing the intention of the researchers working within their particular milieu to be accommodated.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to DiscourseEducational Researcher, 2007
- The problem of appraising qualitative researchQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approachJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2003
- Evaluating the Level of Evidence of Qualitative ResearchJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 2002
- Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked exampleJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2002
- Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes careSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?BMJ, 2001
- Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problemsJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2001
- The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical StudySociology, 1997
- Aggregating Qualitative Findings: An Approach to Theory DevelopmentQualitative Health Research, 1994