Assessment of vascular contrast and wall motion of the aortic root and ascending aorta on MDCT angiography: dual-source high-pitch vs non-gated single-source acquisition schemes
- 28 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 24 (5), 990-997
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3120-2
Abstract
This retrospective study assessed whether dual-source high-pitch computed tomographic angiography (CTA) offered advantages over single-source standard-pitch techniques in the evaluation of the ascending aorta. Twenty patients who received both thoracic dual-source high-pitch and single-source standard-pitch CTAs within 1 year were assessed. Dual-source CTAs were performed; standard-pitch imaging used dose-modulated 120 kVp/150 mAs and 0.8 pitch compared with high-pitch protocols employing dose-modulated 120 kVp/250 mAs and 2.4 target pitch. Radiation dose was documented. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) at sinuses of the Valsalva (CNRValsalva) and ascending aorta (CNRAorta) were calculated. Dose/CNR for each technique was compared with paired t-tests. Motion at aortic valve, aortic root and ascending aorta were assessed with four-point scales and Mann–Whitney U tests; longitudinal extension of motion was compared with paired t-tests. Significantly lower motion scores for high-pitch, compared with standard-pitch acquisitions for aortic annulus, 0 vs. 2, aortic root, 0 vs. 3, and ascending aorta, 0 vs. 2, were achieved. Significantly reduced longitudinal extension of motion at aortic root, 4.9 mm vs 15.7 mm, and ascending aorta, 4.9 mm vs 21.6 mm, was observed. Contrast was not impacted: CNRValsalva, 45.6 vs 46.3, and CNRAorta, 45.3 vs 47.1. CTDIvol was significantly decreased for high-pitch acquisitions, 13.9 mGy vs 15.8 mGy. Dual-source high-pitch CTAs significantly decreased motion artefact without negatively impacting vascular contrast and radiation dose. • Dual-source high-pitch CTA significantly decreased motion artefact of the ascending aorta. • Dual-source high-pitch CTA did not negatively impact on vascular contrast. • Dual-source high-pitch CTA significantly decreased radiation dose compared with single-source standard-pitch acquisitions.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Novel single-source high-pitch protocol for CT angiography of the aorta: comparison to high-pitch dual-source protocol in the context of TAVI planningThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013
- Image Quality and Radiation Exposure With Prospectively ECG-Triggered Axial Scanning for Coronary CT AngiographyJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2012
- High-Pitch Dual-Source CT Angiography of the Thoracic and Abdominal Aorta: Is Simultaneous Coronary Artery Assessment Possible?American Journal of Roentgenology, 2010
- Dual-source chest CT angiography with high temporal resolution and high pitch modes: evaluation of image quality in 140 patientsEuropean Radiology, 2009
- Radiation Dose in Cardiac CTAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Technical principles of dual source CTEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2008
- Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation DoseRadiology, 2008
- Suspected Aortic Dissection and Other Aortic Disorders: Multi–Detector Row CT in 373 Cases in the Emergency SettingRadiology, 2006
- Effects of Heart Rate on Motion Artifacts of the Aorta on Non-ECG-Assisted 0.5-Sec Thoracic MDCTAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2005
- Thoracic Aorta: Motion Artifact Reduction with Retrospective and Prospective Electrocardiography-assisted Multi–Detector Row CTRadiology, 2002