A Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Panel Members' Financial Associations with Industry: A Pernicious Problem Persists
Open Access
- 13 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3), e1001190
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001190
Abstract
Lisa Cosgrove and Sheldon Krimsky examine the new competing interest disclosure policy of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and report that DSM panel members still have considerable financial conflicts of interest.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aripiprazole in the Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Critical Review of the Evidence and Its Dissemination into the Scientific LiteraturePLoS Medicine, 2011
- The influence of corporate and political interests on models of illness in the evolution of the DSMEuropean Psychiatry, 2011
- Conflicts of Interest in Cardiovascular Clinical Practice GuidelinesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Prohibiting or ‘managing’ conflict of interest? A review of policies and procedures in three European drug regulation agenciesSocial Science & Medicine, 2010
- Ghostwriting at Elite Academic Medical Centers in the United StatesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Conflicts of Interest and Disclosure in the American Psychiatric Association’s Clinical Practice GuidelinesPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2009
- Corporate Science and the Husbandry of Scientific and Medical Knowledge by the Pharmaceutical IndustryBioSocieties, 2008
- Relationship between Funding Source and Conclusion among Nutrition-Related Scientific ArticlesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- The pipeline and the porcupine: alternate metaphors of the physician–industry relationshipSocial Science & Medicine, 2005