Stereotypes About Gender and Science
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 40 (2), 244-260
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
Abstract
We conducted two studies and our primary goal was to assess the similarity between stereotypes about women and men and stereotypes about successful scientists. In addition, we examined the degree to which scientists, men, and women are seen as agentic or communal. Results revealed greater similarity between stereotypes about men and stereotypes about scientists than between stereotypes about women and scientists. Men and scientists were seen as highly agentic, women as highly communal, and scientists as less communal than either men or women. The higher the proportion of women in a scientific field, the more similar the stereotypes of scientists in that field were to stereotypes about women. Female participants perceived more similarity between women and scientists and judged women to be more agentic than male participants did. The results are consistent with role-congruity and lack-of-fit theories that report incompatibility of female gender stereotypes with stereotypes about high-status occupational roles. The results demonstrate that women are perceived to lack the qualities needed to be successful scientists, which may contribute to discrimination and prejudice against female scientists. A podcast conversation with the author of this article is available to PWQ subscribers on PWQ's website at http://pwq.sagepub.com/supplementalKeywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male studentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- The gender and leadership warsOrganizational Dynamics, 2011
- New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 2010
- Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrenceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of scienceBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006
- Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Unpacking the Gender SystemGender & Society, 2004
- Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- How Korean students see scientists: the images of the scientistInternational Journal of Science Education, 1999
- The portrayal of minorities and women in selected elementary science seriesJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1985