Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
- 17 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 109 (41), 16474-16479
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Abstract
Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student—who was randomly assigned either a male or female name—for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM CoursesResearch in Higher Education, 2011
- Integrating Theory and Practice to Increase Scientific Workforce Diversity: A Framework for Career Development in Graduate Research TrainingCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2011
- Do Subtle Cues About Belongingness Constrain Women's Career Choices?Psychological Inquiry, 2011
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Reducing the backlash effect: Self‐monitoring and women's promotionsJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011
- Sex Differences in Math-Intensive FieldsCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2010
- “I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discriminationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- "Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995