Keeping Up With Emerging Evidence in (Almost) Real Time
- 21 July 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 173 (2), 153-154
- https://doi.org/10.7326/m20-2627
Abstract
In Annals' first rapid, living systematic review, Chou and colleagues examined the burden of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), SARS-CoV-1, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus on health care workers and risk factors for infection. The editorialists discuss the role of these review types and describe the features they will look for when Annals is considering rapid and living reviews for publication.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Coronavirus Infection in Health Care WorkersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2020
- Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and howJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice GapPLoS Medicine, 2014
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007