Audit Committee Member Support for Proposed Audit Adjustments: A Source Credibility Perspective
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Vol. 22 (2), 189-205
- https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.189
Abstract
This study reports the results of an experiment that investigates the effects of financial-report timing, EPS proximity to analyst forecast, and external auditor argument consistency on audit committee members' support for a proposed audit adjustment. We use source credibility theory to predict greater support for the audit adjustment when the financial report is at year-end rather than at interim, when unadjusted EPS is above rather than below forecast, and when the auditor consistently argues for adjustment rather than agrees with management's preference to avoid adjustment. One hundred thirty-one audit committee members participated in a between-subjects experiment. Consistent with theory, the participants were more likely to recommend adjustment for annual statements and for adjustments that the auditor consistently supported. Two significant interactions indicate that the effect of report timing holds only in the under forecast and inconsistent auditor conditions. Finally, audit committee members who were CPAs were less likely to recommend adjustment. We discuss implications and future research directions.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small Negative Surprises: Frequency and ConsequenceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Intraday Stock Price Reactions to Interim‐Quarter versus Fourth‐Quarter Earnings AnnouncementsJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2000
- Practice SummariesAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1999
- The Joint Effect of Management's Prior Forecast Accuracy and the Form of Its Financial Forecasts on Investor JudgmentJournal of Accounting Research, 1999
- Factors affecting the audit of revalued non‐current assets: Initial public offerings and source reliabilityAccounting & Finance, 1996
- Commercial Lenders' Use of Accounting Information in Interaction with Source Credibility*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1994
- Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Better Liked than RightPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1980
- Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978