Evaluation of risk assessment tools for suspected cancer in general practice: a cohort study
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 63 (606), e30-e36
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13x660751
Abstract
Background Diagnostic delay is deemed to account for an estimated 5000 to 10 000 extra cancer deaths each year in the UK. Many cancer patients do not have symptoms meeting national referral criteria for rapid investigation. Risk assessment tools (RATs) have been developed to assist GPs in selecting patient for cancer investigation. Aim To assess the usability and acceptability of lung and colorectal RATs, as well as subsequent resource use and cancer diagnoses. Design and setting Cohort study with nested qualitative study with 614 GPs from 165 practices in seven English cancer networks were provided with RATs applicable to patients aged ≥40 years with bowel or respiratory symptoms. In-depth interviews were conducted with 34 individuals (11 project managers and 23 GPs). Method The study measured the number of RATs used, and subsequent cancer investigations and diagnoses, over a 6-month period and compared these with the previous 6 months. Results A total of 2593 RATs (1160 lung, 1433 colorectal) were completed. Compared with the preceding 6 months, there were 292 more chest X-rays, 104 extra 2-week chest clinic appointments, and 47 additional diagnoses of lung cancer. For suspected colorectal cancer, there were 304 more 2-week referrals, 270 more colonoscopies, and 10 more cancers identified. RATs appeared to help GPs in their selection of patients for cancer investigation. Users reported that RATs helped to confirm a need for investigation as well as allowing reassurance when investigation was not needed. Conclusion Use of RATs in primary care was accompanied by increased diagnostic activity and additional cancer diagnoses.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidanceGut, 2011
- Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry dataThe Lancet, 2011
- Cancer diagnosis in primary careBritish Journal of General Practice, 2010
- The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in EnglandBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?British Journal of Cancer, 2009
- The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility studyPrimary Health Care Research & Development, 2009
- Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and CancersThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical recordsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Negative chest X-rays in primary care patients with lung cancer.2006