Treatment patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists: Higher adherence and persistence with dulaglutide compared with once‐weekly exenatide and liraglutide
Open Access
- 16 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Vol. 19 (7), 953-961
- https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12902
Abstract
To compare adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]), persistence, and treatment patterns among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) newly initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). More specifically, the main objectives were to compare dulaglutide vs exenatide once weekly and dulaglutide vs liraglutide. Patients with T2DM newly initiating dulaglutide, albiglutide, exenatide once weekly, exenatide twice daily and liraglutide between November 2014 and April 2015 were hierarchically selected from Truven Health's MarketScan Research Databases. Propensity score matching was used to account for selection bias. Adherence to and persistence with the index GLP-1RA, and switching and augmentation patterns were assessed during the 6-month post-index period. Mean adherence for the matched cohorts was significantly higher for dulaglutide than for exenatide once weekly (0.72 vs 0.61; P < .0001) and liraglutide (0.71 vs 0.67; P < .0001). The percentage of patients achieving PDC ≥ 0.80 was significantly higher for dulaglutide compared with exenatide once weekly (54.2% vs 37.9%; P < .0001) and liraglutide (53.5% vs 44.3%; P < .0001). The mean (standard deviation) days on treatment for all matched patients was significantly higher for patients in the dulaglutide cohort compared with those in the exenatide once-weekly (148.4 [55.4] vs 123.6 [61.6]; P < .0001) and liraglutide cohorts (146.0 [56.9] vs 137.4 [60.1]; P < .0001). A significantly lower proportion of patients on dulaglutide discontinued treatment compared with those on exenatide once weekly (26.2% vs 48.4%; P < .0001) and those on liraglutide (28.0% vs 35.6%; P < .0001). Dulaglutide initiators had significantly higher adherence, were more persistent, and had lower discontinuation rates compared with initiators of exenatide once weekly or liraglutide during the 6-month follow-up period.Keywords
Funding Information
- Truven Health Analytics
- Eli Lilly and Company
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metformin: an old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetesDiabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 2013
- Beta Cell Dysfunction and Insulin ResistanceFrontiers in Endocrinology, 2013
- The Impact of Treatment Noncompliance on Mortality in People With Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2012
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- Optimal caliper widths for propensity‐score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studiesPharmaceutical Statistics, 2011
- Incretin-based therapy: a powerful and promising weapon in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitusDiabetes Therapy, 2011
- Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.Psychological Methods, 2010
- The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literatureJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2008
- The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetesThe Lancet, 2006
- Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A ReviewThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004