The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 90 (2), 221-230
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000552
Abstract
Purpose Despite sincere commitment to egalitarian, meritocratic principles, subtle gender bias persists, constraining women’s opportunities for academic advancement. The authors implemented a pair-matched, single-blind, cluster randomized, controlled study of a gender-bias-habit-changing intervention at a large public university. Method Participants were faculty in 92 departments or divisions at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Between September 2010 and March 2012, experimental departments were offered a gender-bias-habit-changing intervention as a 2.5-hour workshop. Surveys measured gender bias awareness; motivation, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations to reduce bias; and gender equity action. A timed word categorization task measured implicit gender/leadership bias. Faculty completed a work–life survey before and after all experimental departments received the intervention. Control departments were offered workshops after data were collected. Results Linear mixed-effects models showed significantly greater changes post intervention for faculty in experimental versus control departments on several outcome measures, including self-efficacy to engage in gender-equity-promoting behaviors (P = .013). When ≥ 25% of a department’s faculty attended the workshop (26 of 46 departments), significant increases in self-reported action to promote gender equity occurred at three months (P = .007). Post intervention, faculty in experimental departments expressed greater perceptions of fit (P = .024), valuing of their research (P = .019), and comfort in raising personal and professional conflicts (P = .025). Conclusions An intervention that facilitates intentional behavioral change can help faculty break the gender bias habit and change department climate in ways that should support the career advancement of women in academic medicine, science, and engineering.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective actionRationality and Society, 2013
- Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male studentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- An Educational Intervention Designed to Increase Women's Leadership Self-EfficacyCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2012
- Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological reviewTrials, 2012
- Does Stereotype Threat Affect Women in Academic Medicine?Academic Medicine, 2012
- Promoting institutional change through bias literacy.Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2012
- The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social NetworkThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- “I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discriminationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- Social cognitive theory of self-regulationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991