Evaluating financial performance in local government: maximizing the benchmarking value
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Review of Administrative Sciences
- Vol. 75 (1), 151-167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099510
Abstract
One of the main problems in evaluating financial performance arises in carrying out comparisons between municipalities, as no account is taken of the impact of certain factors of the social and economic environment on the indicators in question. In this study, the concept of financial condition is applied, revealing the influence of such factors, and a methodology is proposed to minimize their effects on the results of the evaluation. The results of applying these to a sample of municipalities in Spain reveal that the model is useful for reinforcing the value of benchmarking between municipalities with similar characteristics. Points for practitioners The use of indicators for evaluating financial performance has advanced considerably in recent years. However, many criticisms have been made by public sector managers concerning the application of such indicators. One of these is that, in many cases, the values measured by different authorities are not comparable, as the services they provide differ significantly. If local authorities were grouped according to the social and economic factors influencing their provision of public services, the evaluations made would be much more effective, facilitating decision-making by supervisory bodies and by municipal managers.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- NPM and beyond — structure, culture and demographyInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2008
- Performance measurement: test the water before you dive inInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2005
- Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive AgenciesJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005
- Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting EffectsPublic Administration Review, 2005
- The States' Role in U.S. Local Government Fiscal Crises: A Theoretical Model and Results of a National SurveyInternational Journal of Public Administration, 2003
- Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different MeasuresPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and ImplementationPublic Administration Review, 2001
- Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for ReformPublic Administration Review, 2000
- Is Financial Stress an Incentive for the Adoption of Businesslike Planning and Control in Local Government? A Comparative Study of Eight Dutch MunicipalitiesFinancial Accountability & Management, 2000
- Putting Teeth into the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public ServicesPublic Administration Review, 1988