Performance measurement: test the water before you dive in
Open Access
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Review of Administrative Sciences
- Vol. 71 (2), 255-266
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053884
Abstract
Performance measurement and reporting are promoted in various publications as a management concept that can help administrators and elected officials address the issues of productivity and accountability. This article challenges this general assertion for two reasons. First, because the cost of performance score cards is always significant while the benefits, in many instances, may be only tentative. Second, because of possible problems that result when measuring performance is used for two different and potentially competing functions: accountability versus productivity. The article concludes that while performance measurement has a potential, its use should be encouraged but not mandated by external bodies. The article asserts that a more prudent introduction and use of performance score cards may result from better understanding of two things: first, what can go wrong when compiling performance reports; and, second, that there might be a need for other corresponding changes, within and outside government agencies, in order to facilitate meaningful performance reports.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolution of Performance Measurement Until 1930Administration & Society, 2004
- Measuring Government in the Early Twentieth CenturyPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different MeasuresPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Performance Measurement, Accountability, and Improved PerformancePublic Performance & Management Review, 2002
- In the name of accountability ‐State auditing, independence and new public managementAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2001
- Best Value in the United Kingdom: Using Benchmarking and Competition to Achieve Value for MoneyInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2000
- Best Value and Accountability: Issues and ObservationsInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2000
- Mandated performance measurement: A help or a hindrance?National Productivity Review, 1999
- The History of the Productivity MovementPublic Productivity & Management Review, 1990
- An Approach to the Analysis of Political SystemsWorld Politics, 1957