Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity?
- 2 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Creativity Research Journal
- Vol. 23 (1), 24-37
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
Abstract
Derived from the psychometric tradition of creativity research, divergent thinking (DT) tests are the major instrument for measuring people's creative potential. Although still prevalent, DT testing has received substantial criticism of its validity and practical value. This article focuses on the issue of how to reliably and validly assess and predict people's real-world creative potential. Based on reviews of the literatures on the concept of creativity, creative thinking process, the psychometric approach, and DT tests, we examine 6 major weaknesses of traditional DT instruments: lack of construct validity; not testing the integrated general creative process; neglect of domain specificity and expertise; and poor predictive, ecological, and discriminant validities. This evaluation calls for development of improved psychometric instruments to better capture people's creativity in specific professional domains of interest. Broadening the conceptions of creativity and assessment instruments should allow development of more realistic models and theories and enable the psychometric approach to studying creativity to thrive.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guilford's Structure of Intellect Model and Model of Creativity: Contributions and LimitationsCreativity Research Journal, 2001
- Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and FutureCreativity Research Journal, 2001
- From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level CreativityCreativity Research Journal, 2001
- COMMENTARIESPsychological Inquiry, 1999
- Who is creative? Identifying children's creative abilitiesRoeper Review, 1998
- The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated:Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessmentRoeper Review, 1998
- The Scientific Study of Expert Levels of Performance: general implications for optimal learning and creativity1High Ability Studies, 1998
- Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativityPersonality and Individual Differences, 1993
- Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspectiveCreativity Research Journal, 1988
- Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971