The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated:Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Roeper Review
- Vol. 21 (1), 36-39
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553924
Abstract
Current work on creativity is based on methodologies which either are psychometric in nature or were developed in response to perceived weaknesses of creativity measurement. However, psychometric perspectives on creativity are still a vibrant and vital area of study. Considerable evidence of validity (or lack thereof) has been gathered for a diverse set of instruments and assessment techniques, and the resulting improvement in measurement quality has opened the door to several exciting areas of research. We review some of the current issues, describe recent advances, and suggest future directions for psychometric approaches to creativity research.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance assessments of creativity:Do they have long‐term stability?Roeper Review, 1994
- Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experimentCreativity Research Journal, 1994
- Trends in the creativity literature: An analysis of research in thejournal of creative behavior(1967–1989)Creativity Research Journal, 1993
- Testing for creative potentialContemporary Educational Psychology, 1989
- Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspectiveCreativity Research Journal, 1988
- Story‐telling: A Method For Assessing Children's CreativityThe Journal of Creative Behavior, 1988
- A Validation Study of a Measure of Musical CreativityJournal of Research in Music Education, 1988
- Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- A Comparison of Statistical Infrequency and Subjective Judgment as Criteria in the Measurement of OriginalityJournal of Personality Assessment, 1979
- FLUENCY AS A PERVASIVE ELEMENT IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CREATIVITY1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970