Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 58 (1), 133-165
- https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0019
Abstract
Research on regime change has often wound up chasing events in the post-Soviet world because it has frequently assumed that regime change, if not simple instability, implies a trajectory toward a regime-type endpoint like democracy or autocracy. A supplemental approach recognizes that regime change can be cyclic, not just progressive, regressive, or random. In fact, regime cycles are much of what we see in the postcommunist world, where some states have oscillated from autocracy toward greater democracy, then back toward more autocracy, and, with recent “colored revolutions,” toward greater democracy again. An institutional logic of elite collective action, focusing on the effects ofpatronalpresidentialism,is shown to be useful in understanding such cyclic dynamics, explaining why “revolutions” occurred between 2003 and 2005 in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan but not in countries like Russia, Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transitions from PostcommunismJournal of Democracy, 2005
- Georgia's Rose RevolutionJournal of Democracy, 2004
- Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive AuthoritarianismJournal of Democracy, 2002
- Democratization Falters in AzerbaijanJournal of Democracy, 2001
- Political Liberalization in Africa after Ten YearsComparative Politics, 2001
- SECOND EUROPE-ASIA LECTURE: Regime Transition, Uncertainty and Prospects for Democratisation: The Politics of Russia's Regions in a Comparative PerspectiveEurope-Asia Studies, 1999
- What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science, 1999
- A Politics of Institutional ChoiceComparative Political Studies, 1997
- Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical AppraisalComparative Politics, 1997
- The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and BreakdownsAmerican Sociological Review, 1989