What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Political Science
- Vol. 2 (1), 115-144
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
Abstract
This essay synthesizes the results of the large number of studies of late–20th-century democratization published during the last 20 years. Strong evidence supports the claims that democracy is more likely in more developed countries and that regime transitions of all kinds are more likely during economic downturns. Very few of the other arguments advanced in the transitions literature, however, appear to be generally true. This study proposes a theoretical model, rooted in characteristics of different types of authoritarian regimes, to explain many of the differences in democratization experience across cases in different regions. Evidence drawn from a data set that includes 163 authoritarian regimes offers preliminary support for the model proposed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tipping the Civil-Military BalanceComparative Political Studies, 1998
- Adding Collective Actors to Collective Outcomes: Labor and Recent Democratization in South America and Southern EuropeComparative Politics, 1997
- Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict during Democratic TransitionsComparative Politics, 1997
- The Political Economy of Democratic TransitionsComparative Politics, 1997
- Redefining Civil-Military Relations in HondurasJournal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 1996
- Politicians against Soldiers: Contesting the Military in Postauthorization BrazilComparative Politics, 1995
- Civil-Military Relations and Argentine Democracy: The Armed Forces under the Menem GovernmentArmed Forces & Society, 1994
- Popular Protest and Political Reform in AfricaComparative Politics, 1992
- Rethinking Regime ChangeComparative Politics, 1990
- On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic PerformanceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1973