Clinical guidelines: Using clinical guidelines
- 13 March 1999
- Vol. 318 (7185), 728-730
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7185.728
Abstract
This is the last in a series of four articles on issues in the development and use of clinical guidelines In this series we have discussed the advantages and disadvantages of clinical guidelines, methods of guideline development, and the legal, political, and emotional aspects of guidelines. Assuming that the overriding purpose of clinical guidelines is to improve the quality of care for patients, in this final article we discuss how healthcare organisations (hospitals, general practices, etc) and individual clinicians can use clinical guidelines to improve clinical effectiveness. The development of good guidelines does not ensure their use in practice. Systematic reviews of strategies for changing professional behaviour show that relatively passive methods of disseminating and implementing guidelines—by publication in professional journals or mailing to targeted healthcare professionals—rarely lead to changes in professional behaviour. 1 2 Lomas observed that the failure of passive dissemination strategies is unsurprising given that many factors influence healthcare professionals‘ behaviour,3 and this has led to increased recognition of factors that help or hinder implementation at various levels: the organisation, peer group, and individual clinician. Therefore, to maximise the likelihood of a clinical guideline being used we need coherent dissemination and implementation strategies to capitalise on known positive factors and to deal with obstacles to implementation that have already been identified. #### Summary points The implementation of clinical guidelines within a clinical governance setting requires time, enthusiasm, and resources Local groups should adopt pre-existing valid guidelines Implementation activity should draw on the available evidence Clinical guidelines can also be used within continuing medical education or to answer specific clinical questions In the same way as topics for guideline development need to be prioritised,4 organisations need a process by which they can set and pursue their clinical priorities. These can reflect national priorities or can be set at a …This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelinesBMJ, 1999
- Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelinesBMJ, 1999
- North of England evidence based development project: guideline for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in primary care management of adults with symptomatic heart failureBMJ, 1998
- North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline developmentBMJ, 1996
- Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east LondonBMJ, 1995
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Appraising clinical guidelines: towards a "which" guide for purchasers.Heart, 1994
- Single and Combined Strategies for Implementing Changes in Primary Care: A Literature ReviewInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1994
- Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples?BMJ, 1993