Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 58 (4), 421-424
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of mode of data collection and of non-response on reported alcohol consumption: a split-sample study in SwitzerlandAddiction, 2000
- Mode effects in surveys of gay men: A within‐individual comparison of responses by mail and by telephoneThe Journal of Sex Research, 1999
- An Examination of Self- and Telephone-Administered Modes of Administration for the Australian SF-36Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Effect of the Method of Administration, Mail or Telephone, on the Validity and Reliability of a Respiratory Health Questionnaire. The Spanish Centers of the European Asthma StudyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Mode Effects in a Survey of Medicare Prostate Surgery PatientsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1998
- The Influence of Data Collection Method on Structural ModelsSociological Methods & Research, 1996
- Does the mode of questionnaire administration affect the reporting of urinary symptoms?Urology, 1995
- Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National SurveyMedical Care, 1994
- A Comparison of Mail and Telephone Interview Strategies for Mental Health SurveysThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from HouseholdsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967