Does the mode of questionnaire administration affect the reporting of urinary symptoms?
- 30 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 46 (3), 341-345
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80217-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National SurveyMedical Care, 1994
- Relationship of Symptoms of Prostatism to Commonly Used Physiological and Anatomical Measures of the Severity of Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, 1993
- The prevalence of Prostatism: A Population-Based Survey of Urinary SymptomsJournal of Urology, 1993
- Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthmaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for benign prostatic hyperplasiaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, 1992
- Sensitivity to Change and the Effect of Mode of Administration on Health Status MeasurementMedical Care, 1987
- A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.American Journal of Public Health, 1979
- An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response DistortionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976
- A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from HouseholdsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967