The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses
Top Cited Papers
- 25 April 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 66 (7), 736-742.e5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectnessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication biasJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecisionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008