Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors
Top Cited Papers
- 19 February 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 158 (4), 280-286
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009
Abstract
Previous work has identified 6 important areas to consider when evaluating validity and bias in studies of prognostic factors: participation, attrition, prognostic factor measurement, confounding measurement and account, outcome measurement, and analysis and reporting. This article describes the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool, which includes questions related to these areas that can inform judgments of risk of bias in prognostic research. A working group comprising epidemiologists, statisticians, and clinicians developed the tool as they considered prognosis studies of low back pain. Forty-three groups reviewing studies addressing prognosis in other topic areas used the tool and provided feedback. Most reviewers (74%) reported that reaching consensus on judgments was easy. Median completion time per study was 20 minutes; interrater agreement (kappa statistic) reported by 9 review teams varied from 0.56 to 0.82 (median, 0.75). Some reviewers reported challenges making judgments across prompting items, which were addressed by providing comprehensive guidance and examples. The refined Quality In Prognosis Studies tool may be useful to assess the risk of bias in studies of prognostic factors.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- Optimal Designs for Prediction Studies of WhiplashSpine, 2011
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Duration of fever and serious bacterial infections in children: a systematic reviewBMC Family Practice, 2011
- Serum Levels of Phosphorus, Parathyroid Hormone, and Calcium and Risks of Death and Cardiovascular Disease in Individuals With Chronic Kidney DiseaseJAMA, 2011
- Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes Among Adults: A Systematic Review of Prospective StudiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- The effects of shift work on body weight change − a systematic review of longitudinal studiesScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2011
- Evaluating the Quality of Research into a Single Prognostic Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 83 Studies of C-Reactive Protein in Stable Coronary Artery DiseasePLoS Medicine, 2010
- Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results—guidance for future prognosis reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyondBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009