Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases
- 30 June 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 65 (6), 610-618
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.017
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT 2010 StatementObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- From the EditorsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studiesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Maternal infection and risk of preeclampsia: Systematic review and metaanalysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Depression and Risk for Alzheimer DiseaseArchives of General Psychiatry, 2006
- The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Effective Health Care Program: Creating a Dynamic System for Discovering and Reporting What Works in Health CareAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2005
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature reviewJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003