Decomposition of Fraud‐Risk Assessments and Auditors' Sensitivity to Fraud Cues*
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Accounting Research
- Vol. 21 (3), 719-745
- https://doi.org/10.1506/hgxp-4dbh-59d1-3fhj
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of Alternative Risk Assessment and Program Planning Tools in a Fraud Setting*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2004
- A Test of Changes in Auditors' Fraud-Related Planning Judgments since the Issuance of SAS No. 82AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2003
- The Effects of Judgments of New Clients' Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence, and FeesAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2001
- The Relative Importance of Management Fraud Risk FactorsBehavioral Research in Accounting, 2001
- Accountability, the Dilution Effect, and Conservatism in Auditors' Fraud JudgmentsJournal of Accounting Research, 1997
- A Generalized Qualitative-Response Model and the Analysis of Management FraudManagement Science, 1996
- Conditioned Assessment of Subjective Probabilities: Identifying the Benefits of DecompositionOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Implications of Seemingly Irrelevant Evidence in Audit JudgmentJournal of Accounting Research, 1992
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Social perception and phenomenal causality.Psychological Review, 1944