A Test of Changes in Auditors' Fraud-Related Planning Judgments since the Issuance of SAS No. 82
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Vol. 22 (2), 237-251
- https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.237
Abstract
This study is a post-SAS No. 82 replication of Zimbelman (1997) (hereafter Z97), which examined the effect of a separate and explicit fraud-risk assessment as later required by SAS No. 82. Z97 found weak evidence that this requirement would impact auditors' planning judgments. However, because Z97 was conducted before SAS No. 82 was issued, that study was unable to capture the full effect of SAS No. 82 on the audit environment (e.g., related guidance and training, audit policy, and implementation experience). In this study, we compare pre- and post-SAS No. 82 planning judgments and find that post-SAS No. 82 judgments are more sensitive to fraud risk factors. Specifically, we find that post-SAS No. 82 participants are more aware of the need to modify audit plans and are more likely to increase the extent of their audit tests in response to increased fraud risk when compared with the pre-SAS No. 82 participants in Z97. However, we do not find evidence that auditors modify the nature of their planned tests in response to fraud risk either before or after SAS No. 82.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditing Firms' Fraud Risk Assessment PracticesAccounting Horizons, 2001
- An Experimental Assessment of Recent Professional Developments in Nonstatistical Audit Sampling GuidanceAUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2001
- The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical proceduresAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2001
- Why Do Audits Fail? Evidence from Lincoln Savings and LoanJournal of Accounting Research, 2000
- The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- Assessing Audit Risk from Errors and IrregularitiesJournal of Accounting Research, 1990
- Auditor Reporting Decisions Involving Accounting Principle Changes: Some Evidence on Materiality ThresholdsJournal of Accounting Research, 1989
- Abnormal stock returns associated with media disclosures of ‘subject to’ qualified audit opinionsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1986