Awareness, knowledge, use, willingness to use and need of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) during World Gay Pride 2017
Open Access
- 19 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (10), e0204738
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204738
Abstract
To assess the awareness, knowledge, use, and willingness to use and need of PrEP among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) who attended World Gay Pride (WGP) 2017 in Madrid. Online survey. Participants were recruited through gay-oriented dating apps and HIV Non-Governmental Organizations´ social media. Inclusion criteria included being MSM or TW, age 18 years old or above, and having attended WGP in Madrid. Information regarding the participant’s awareness and knowledge, use or willingness to use, and need for PrEP was collected, as well as sociodemographic characteristics. Participants were considered to be in need of PrEP if they met one of the following indication criteria: having practiced unprotected anal intercourse with more than 2 partners, having practiced chemsex, or having engaged in commercial sex—all in the preceding 6 months. Descriptive and multivariable analyses with logistic regression were conducted. 472 participants met the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 38, 97.7% were MSM, 77% had a university education, and 85% were living in Spain, mostly in big cities. Overall, 64% of participants were aware of PrEP, but only 33% knew correctly what PrEP was. 67% of HIV-negative participants were willing to take PrEP, although only 5% were taking it during WGP, mostly due to lack of access. 43% of HIV-negative respondents met at least one PrEP indication criteria. For HIV-negative men living in Spain, university education and living in big cities was associated with PrEP awareness. Lower education level and meeting PrEP criteria was associated with willingness to use PrEP. Our study shows that among MSM attending WGP 2017 in Madrid, there was limited PrEP awareness, low accuracy of PrEP knowledge, and a high need and willingness to use PrEP. Health authorities should strengthen existing preventive strategies and implement PrEP.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Stigma Surrounding the Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Undermines Prevention and Pleasure: A Call to Destigmatize “Truvada Whores”American Journal of Public Health, 2015
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trialThe Lancet, 2015
- What do Dutch MSM think of preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-infection? A cross-sectional studyAIDS, 2015
- Acceptability of PrEP among HIV negative Portuguese men who have sex with men that attended 2014 Lisbon pride fairJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2014
- Delayed HIV diagnosis and initiation of antiretroviral therapyAIDS, 2014
- Highlights on HIV eradication in 2013AIDS, 2014
- Awareness and use of nonoccupational HIV post‐exposure prophylaxis among people receiving rapid HIV testing in SpainHIV Medicine, 2012
- Acceptability of an “on-demand” pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis trial among men who have sex with men living in FranceAIDS Care, 2011
- Sexually Transmitted Infections and Sexual Practices among Injecting Drug Users in Harm Reduction Centers in CataloniaEuropean Addiction Research, 2011
- Risk of Viral Failure Declines With Duration of Suppression on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Irrespective of Adherence LevelJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2010