Secondary Porosity and Permeability of Coal vs. Gas Composition and Pressure
- 19 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) in SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Vol. 9 (02), 114-125
- https://doi.org/10.2118/90255-pa
Abstract
Summary: We have been investigating the sequestration of atmospheric pollutants by injection into coal seams while at the same time enhancing hydrocarbon productivity by displacement of methane with pollutants. Our effort is one of several field-based research efforts into CO2 storage in coal seams that are currently operating in Canada (Mavor et al. 2004), China (Robinson et al. 2004), Japan (Nago and Komaki 2004), and Poland (Van Bergen et al. 2004). During the course of our field measurements, we have been using single-well injection, soak, and production tests to collect data required to understand and predict enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery potential and sequestration capacity. We found that changing the composition of the gas sorbed into the coal changes the porosity and permeability of the coal natural-fracture system owing to gas-content changes, which cause matrix swelling or shrinkage due to relative adsorption of different gases. We collected sufficient information to develop a method for predicting the permeability and porosity of a coalbed as a function of the secondary porosity system (SPS) pressure and the gas content and composition of the primary porosity system (PPS). The method uses data from injection/falloff tests with water and/or a weaker adsorbing gas (WAG) than CH4 and a stronger adsorbing gas (SAG) than CH4. Estimates of effective permeability to gas and water obtained from these tests are used with an iterative computation procedure subject to constraints to solve for equivalent SPS porosity and absolute permeability at atmospheric pressure. Once calibrated, the model can be used to predict a coalbed's permeability and porosity as a function of injection pressure and injected-fluid composition, which in turn are used to predict injection performance. The model is applicable to production forecasts to account for SPS permeability and porosity changes as reservoir pressure declines with changes in gas composition. This paper describes the new model and discusses well-test procedures to obtain the data required for model calibration. Also included are coal property estimates resulting from Alberta Medicine River (Manville) coal core and test data and an example model calibration.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model for Changes in Coalbed Permeability During Primary and Enhanced Methane RecoverySPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2005
- Alberta Multiwell Micro-Pilot Testing for CBM Properties, Enhanced Methane Recovery And CO2 Storage PotentialPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2004
- How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New ModelSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1998
- Increasing Coal Absolute Permeability in the San Juan Basin Fruitland FormationSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1998
- Equilibrium Adsorption of Gas MixturesPublished by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd ,1997
- How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New ModelPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,1996
- Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability IncreasesPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,1995
- Analysis of Coal Gas Reservoir Interference and Cavity Well TestsPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,1993
- Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in CoalsPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,1992
- Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1—The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal SeamsSPE Reservoir Engineering, 1987