When Do Changes in Cancer Survival Mean Progress? The Insight From Population Incidence and Mortality
Open Access
- 1 November 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Monographs
- Vol. 2014 (49), 187-197
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu014
Abstract
It is often assumed that increases in cancer survival reflect true progress against cancer. This is true when these increases are accompanied by decreased burden of disease: Fewer people being diagnosed or dying from cancer (ie, decreased incidence and mortality). But increased survival can also occur even when incidence is increasing and mortality is unchanged. To use trends in cancer burden—incidence and mortality—to illustrate when changes in survival reflect true progress. Using data from 1975 to 2010 collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (incidence, survival) and the National Center for Health Statistics (mortality), we analyzed US trends in five-year relative survival, age-adjusted incidence, and mortality for selected cancers to identify patterns that do and do not reflect progress. Among the nine common cancers examined, survival increased in seven, and changed little or not at all for two. In some cases, increased survival was accompanied by decreased burden of disease, reflecting true progress. For example, from 1975 to 2010, five-year survival for colon cancer patients improved (from 48% to 68%) while cancer burden fell: Fewer cases (incidence decreased from 60 to 41 per 100000) and fewer deaths (mortality decreased from 28 to 16 per 100000), a pattern explained by both increased early detection (with removal of cancer precursors) and more effective treatment. In other cases, however, increased survival did not reflect true progress. In melanoma, kidney, and thyroid cancer, five-year survival increased but incidence increased with no change in mortality. This pattern suggests overdiagnosis from increased early detection, an increase in cancer burden. Changes in survival must be interpreted in the context of incidence and mortality. Increased survival only represents progress when accompanied by a reduction in incidence, mortality, or ideally both.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Reduced Tobacco Smoking on Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States During 1975–2000JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?British Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Lead Time and Overdiagnosis in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Importance of Methods and ContextJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Modelling Population-Based Cancer Survival Trends by using Join Point Models for Grouped Survival DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2009
- EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentaryEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco ControlJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)The Lancet Oncology, 2008
- How much of the decrease in cancer death rates in the United States is attributable to reductions in tobacco smoking?Tobacco Control, 2006
- The EUROCARE II studyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- The Will Rogers PhenomenonNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985