Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism
Open Access
- 19 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 6 (1), 40-44
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02820.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative diagnosis other than pulmonary embolism as a subjective variable in the Wells clinical decision rule: not so bad after allJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: The Revised Geneva ScoreAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed TomographyJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous thromboembolism: a systematic reviewJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- The Contribution of the Subjective Component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the Overall Score in Emergency Department PatientsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolismAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2002
- Assessing Clinical Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency WardArchives of Internal Medicine, 2001
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982