Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal Of Medicine
- Vol. 113 (4), 269-275
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01212-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Clinical Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency WardArchives of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolismThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Chest Radiographs in Acute Pulmonary EmbolismChest, 2000
- Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism: A Community-based Study in Western FranceThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2000
- Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatientsThe Lancet, 1999
- Clinical Prediction RulesJAMA, 1996
- Alveolar-Arterial Oxygen Gradient in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary EmbolismChest, 1995
- Clinical, Laboratory, Roentgenographic, and Electrocardiographic Findings in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism and No Pre-Existing Cardiac or Pulmonary DiseaseChest, 1991
- A Population-Based Perspective of the Hospital Incidence and Case-Fatality Rates of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary EmbolismArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Value of the Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary EmbolismJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1990