Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals
- 30 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (11), 1216-1222
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Governed by the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Epidemiology, 2009
- Applying the CONSORT and STROBE Statements to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration StudiesOphthalmology, 2009
- Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT StatementInternal Medicine, 2009
- Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journalsContemporary Clinical Trials, 2008
- Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)Nursing Outlook, 2008
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic reviewThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statementContemporary Clinical Trials, 2005
- The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklistControlled Clinical Trials, 2002
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001