The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist
- 9 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 23 (4), 380-388
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00214-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2001
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscriptsControlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1993
- Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritisControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.Circulation, 1981